New AI cancer survival calculator offers more accurate estimates for patients
Researchers tested the prototype tool on a nationwide cancer dataset.
Published
3 years ago onBy
Talker News
By Stephen Beech via SWNS
A new "highly accurate" cancer survival calculator is being developed using artificial intelligence.
The new tool can estimate how long patients with breast, thyroid, and pancreatic cancers have left to live to within months, say American scientists.
The prototype developed with machine learning showed that for each of the three cancer types tested, more factors than the cancer stage significantly influenced patients’ survival.
Currently, estimating survival rates for patients with cancer primarily depends on what stage the disease has reached.
Study lead author Dr. Lauren Janczewski said: “There is a multitude of other factors that may influence a patient’s survival beyond just their staging criteria.
“We sought to develop this Cancer Survival Calculator to provide a more personalized estimate of what patients can expect regarding their cancer prognosis.”
The researchers tested the prototype tool on a nationwide cancer dataset. Initial tests estimated five-year survival for patients with cancers of the breast, thyroid, and pancreas.

Dr. Janczewski says the study aimed to identify the patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics that most greatly influence patient survival for each cancer type.
After cancer experts recommended characteristics to study, the researchers collected relevant information from patients diagnosed in 2015 and 2017 with breast, thyroid, and pancreatic cancers.
The patients’ records were part of the National Cancer Database (NCDB), which contains records of 72 percent of newly diagnosed cancer cases in the United States.
Three-quarters of the collected data were used to train the machine learning algorithms to recognize patterns between characteristics at diagnosis and patients’ survival at five years, and then to rank the factors with the greatest influence on survival.
With the remaining data, the researchers used statistical methods to test the prototype’s accuracy in estimating survival.
The team included data from more than 250,000 breast cancer patients, 76,624 thyroid cancer patients, and 84,514 pancreatic cancer patients.
The researchers found multiple characteristics specific to patients, tumors, and treatments for all three cancer sites significantly influenced survival.
The top four factors influencing whether patients were alive five years after diagnosis for breast cancer were whether the patient had cancer surgery, the patient’s age at diagnosis, tumor size, and time from diagnosis to treatment.

For thyroid cancer, they were age at diagnosis, tumor size, time to treatment, and lymph node involvement.
And for pancreatic cancer, they were cancer surgery; histology, or microscopic analysis of the cancer, tumor size, and age at diagnosis.
Also found to be important for survival from breast cancer were hormone receptor status, which is part of breast cancer staging, and the presence of Ki-67, a biomarker in breast cancer.
Although some of the predictive factors, such as tumor size, are part of cancer staging, Dr. Janczewski said their results showed that many more factors influence survival for cancer patients beyond their disease stage.
Dr. Janczewski, a general surgical resident at Northwestern University McGaw Medical Centre in Chicago, said their validation testing showed that the calculator was “highly accurate” at estimating cancer survival rates – within nine to 10 months of actual survival.
She said: "The Cancer Survival Calculator differs in several ways from cancer survival estimators already in use."
It includes specific tumor biomarkers and treatment variables that are known to affect a patient’s estimated prognosis, which Dr. Janczewski said many prior survival calculators lack.
She added: "The dataset used to develop the new calculator, the NCDB, is more comprehensive than other calculators’ datasets."
The research team plans to make the finalized informational tool available to healthcare practitioners.
The findings are due to be presented at the American College of Surgeons (ACS) annual Clinical Congress in Boston, Massachusetts.
Stories and infographics by ‘Talker Research’ are available & ready to use. Stories and videos by ‘Talker News’ are managed by Talker Inc. For queries, please submit an inquiry via our contact form.
You may like

Which fruits are best to eat for better heart health?

‘Intelligent tattoo’ detects deadliest skin cancer before it appears

Ice Age woolly mammoth found likely butchered by hunters

Research reveals early Europeans ate creepy crawlies regularly

Bumblebees able to problem solve despite having tiny brains

Is working from home bad for employees’ mental health?
Other Stories

11-year-old boy finds 1.8 million year-old elephant tooth on beach
The find, which is about four inches in width, was confirmed as the upper left molar of an Anancus arvernensis.

Fans who went to 1986 Mexico World Cup will reunite at 2026 tourney in US
"We're all just family and have always stayed in touch."

Street sign famous for Paul McCartney link keeps getting stolen
The road has attracted international attention since McCartney named his latest album "The Boys of Dungeon Lane" after it.

Banksy artworks owned by Matthew Perry sold for over $1 million
Both are signed by Banksy.

Which fruits are best to eat for better heart health?
Plums, cranberries and blackberries are best fruits for your heart, according to a new scientific study.
Top Talkers
History7 days agoContents of 5,300-year-old Ötzi the Iceman’s body revealed
Mental Health5 days agoIs working from home bad for employees’ mental health?
Money7 days agoHow pressure to provide impacts modern men
Science5 days agoFossils reveal how ancient cattle roamed Earth 4 million years ago
Life5 days agoDad embarks on journey across Atlantic Ocean in tiny boat
Tech5 days agoDo software updates make our devices worse?
Wellness6 days agoTop 5 ways to live a healthy, long life
Sports6 days agoGolfers land back‑to‑back holes‑in‑one in 156 million‑to‑one feat