Taylor Swift fans paid $1.8K for VIP seats but still sat three rows back
"We were disappointed that we did not receive the experience that we had paid for."
Published
3 years ago onBy
Talker NewsBy Barney Riley via SWNS
Taylor Swift fans who paid more than £1,400 ($1,800) to get front-row VIP seats were angry when they ended up three rows back.
The anonymous pair went to see their favorite artist at the Raymond James Stadium in Tampa, Fla., on April 15.
The friends, who are both from Florida, had bought the tickets six months earlier at an eye-watering fee of £1,463.86 ($1,865.12).

On the day of the concert, the pair excitedly made their way towards the front row only to find out they were actually sat three rows back.
The promoter had allegedly added two rows in front of the ones allocated for their tickets.
They said: "When we arrived at the stadium and to our seats at the end of the row, which were supposed to be front row at the end of the catwalk, we noticed row 9 was not front row.
"The promoter had extended row 7 and row 8.
"Row 7 was now the front row for our specific section."
The pair were obviously shocked and disappointed after paying so much and waiting so long for the event.
They said: "After the cost of the seats, subsequent fees, and insurance, we paid roughly $1865.12 (£1,463.86) for both tickets.
"Our specific seats were VIP because they were front row."
The pair explained that the seats they ended up with actually cost hundreds of dollars less.
They said: "The rows that would have been behind us have scattered VIP seats, so we would have been able to pay hundreds less if we had truly paid for third-row seats."
While at the concert they thought this must have been a mistake.
So, they went to explain what happened to the organizers, who ended up blaming it on Taylor Swift's own team.
They said: "We immediately went to the guest services and asked them why our seats were moved back.
"They ended up telling us that it was the promoter's fault and Taylor Swift's team added them.
"Guest services told us that the seats were added for Taylor Swift's friends and family, but she has a tent on the floor specifically for that purpose, so this was not true.
"There were cases at other venues where people were moved if their seats weren't as described.

"This was not the case for us and there were no accommodations made.
"We asked a girl in the extended row eight how she was able to get tickets, she said she had bought them the day of the concert for $1.2k off of Seat Geek.
"We have no idea how Seat Geek was able to sell tickets that were not available for presale when we originally purchased ours.
"There was a man sitting in front of us who exclaimed how surprised he was that he was able to snag tickets so close on the day of the concert."
After the concert, the pair contacted the ticket provider, who told them that nothing could be done.
They also contacted the Better Business Bureau to help with claiming their money back by contacting the ticket provider and Taylor Swift's team on their behalf.
But they have yet to receive a response from any of the parties involved.
This was the pair's first experience of seeing Taylor Swift live after being fans since they were "old enough to walk."

But despite the seat issue, they still managed to have a good time.
They said: "We were disappointed that we did not receive the experience that we had paid for.
"There were parts of the concert where Taylor Swift would walk to the end of the catwalk and perform in front of our section.
"If we had the front row as we originally paid for, I believe our experience would be better.
"There were a few tall people who were now in front of us, which obstructed our view at times.
"Overall, my experience wasn't ruined. We enjoyed the concert as Taylor Swift is an amazing performer.
"I believe if the promoter was going to add seats last minute, they should have added them to the last row on the floor so nobody would be at a loss.
"I still love Taylor Swift and will continue to support her.
"I believe this is not a decision she made on her part. I believe this was a decision made by the promoter."
Stories and infographics by ‘Talker Research’ are available & ready to use. Stories and videos by ‘Talker News’ are managed by Talker Inc. For queries, please submit an inquiry via our contact form.
You may like

Is this man Banksy?

Woman makes $250K-a-year with pumpkin porch decor side hustle

Photographer captures squirrel getting into Halloween spirit

Superfan spends thousands on ‘Stranger Things’ display at home

Three women surf with pumpkins on their heads for Halloween

Man chugs pint of beer using his nose
Other Stories

Is that cat just playing? Study warns it may be causing distress
Playing with your cat in the wrong way can have serious consequences, a new study warns.

‘Police-obsessed’ 3-year-old calls cops to save mom
He called the police when his mom, suddenly became seriously unwell and fell unconscious and wasn't waking up.

‘Excalibur’ sword surfaces after drought drains historic castle lake
Theories about its owner include soldiers, Victorian bandsmen, an art dealer — or a ghost.

Can heat waves affect how well the pill works?
A pharmacists warns that heat gradually speeds up the natural processes that cause a medicine to break down over time.

Consoles considered ‘holy grail’ of Nintendo history for sale
The consoles were officially licensed variants of the Game & Watch series used a French cereal and infant food product.
Top Talkers
Transportation5 days agoUS hires over 2,000 video gamers as air traffic controllers
Studies23 hours agoAre our friendships good for us?
Travel4 days agoWhy 3 in 5 haven’t taken a vacation this summer
History5 days agoDivers find 1864 bottle of Guinness in shipwreck
Food & Drink5 days agoIs family meal planning too much of a mental load?
Science5 days agoWhat’s inside the Pentagon’s newest UFO files?
Studies5 days agoDo babies who live with dogs get sick less?
Food & Drink5 days agoSeaweed coating keeps strawberries fresh without refrigeration